Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1257201-20161227233458/@comment-6369172-20161228042624

When the arrows are eventually deleted, a large amount of information will be lost. Is there a plan for noting those Prior and Next appearances, in the Notes sections, before that happens?

S >>The template itself (apn) creates unwanted confusion as it makes no distinction between canon appearances and chronological appearances.<<

There should be no case where the arrows point to anything other than the chronological Prior or Next appearance. Are there such cases?

It seems like it would be less laborious to correct the smaller number of misleading arrows, than to re-produce the function of all of the existing arrows, in the Notes sections.