Thread:Shadzane/@comment-246292-20160523192222/@comment-918732-20160526151446

Kyletheobald wrote: I disagree that DC owning the characters and them acting like they own them is the same thing. While it might not matter for publishing rights, it matters factually. We cover facts, not conjecture. So, I think it's better to not say anything concrete in this case.

I see what you are saying. My note says DC bought the character in 1991, and that may not be literally true.

Kyletheobald wrote: To the second point, you're right, it may be a difference of opinion. I think it makes more sense to explain the complexities of Fawcett's relationship with DC on the Fawcett page. That way we don't, for lack of a better word, clutter up hundreds of pages with more or less the same note.

I do agree that the Fawcett page needs some work. Maybe I will focus my efforts there, and put this project aside for a bit.