Thread:Kyletheobald/@comment-3567304-20140515214306/@comment-1038387-20140601140324

Nope. It's unnamed in NG #7, and as such, should appear in the notes section in the commentary. I'll have to check FP #1 to see what its properties were there.

Language and composition were still a problem. It's a short section on properties and then bam, without pause or introduction, a couple of sentences for some early uses. The sentences themselves are weirdly phrased too. Readability of those sentences is close to zero.