Thread:Tupka217/@comment-3361105-20130704164420/@comment-1038387-20130704170222

Hatebunny wrote: That first one is the textless version of the cover. You can see by the logo's placement on the real cover. Is it? The ratio seems off to me.

Hatebunny wrote: I say the second one should be replaced, too. The character is prominent in it. I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't be chopping up covers or textless covers for the sake of making a character who is already prominent in it slightly more prominent.

[...]

If the full textless cover for an image doesn't suit the needs of a character image, that doesn't matter. It suits our needs elsewhere, killing two birds with one stone. There is absolutely no reason to have a crop of a cover we already have a textless version of.

Fine with me. I'll tag them with Replace Image, then.