Thread:Varese/@comment-1038387-20120707095744/@comment-1038387-20120708175214


 * Abuse of power would be if I blocked you over an edit war on a subjective topic. Like, say, the alignment of Robert E. Lee (but let's not go there).
 * This is not a subjective matter. The topic boxes link to disambiguation pages. It is the standard for just about every topic box on this wiki. I can only think of one or two that don't. Your only argument to not follow the standard was "It lists the New Earth presidents". I countered that point by saying several did not appear in New Earth, or in non-canon stories, or not as Presidents. (I gave an example with JQ Adams; I could give more: Eisenhower, Grant, Harding, Harrison, Madison)
 * Contrary to popular belief, a block does not need an explicit warning beforehand.
 * We were having a discussion. In the meantime, I had made several adjustments to cater to points you raised, and moved several pages to different universes. I relinked the template accordingly. I also removed links for presidents that did not appear anywhere in the DC Universe. Without replying, you reverted all of those edits - and thus created a template full of red links. The only reason you gave was "I did explain."
 * Giving an unsatisfactory reason, ignoring discussion, and reverting unrelated edits... those three are enough reason for a block without warning.
 * I blocked you for a week, which is not much. People have been blocked for longer, for less (and not by me). I unblocked you while review was pending. Hatebunny suggested bringing it down to two days, but didn't reblock you. Since a day more has passed, only a day would remain. I won't block you for that day. I'll leave it at that.