Thread:Tupka217/@comment-233389-20170101034157/@comment-28125426-20170101052339

I just read the whole thing.

Admin are busy. They don't always have time to fix other people's writing. If he didn't undo it, he would have instead added article maintenance templates for, OOU, Citations Needed and Copy Edit. Then someone else would have to rewrite it anyway. (Probably me, because I'm actively fixing OOU articles.)

I can understand it can be easy to take it personally when an edit doesn't make the admins' high starndards, but it's not personal, they are just trying to make the Database the best it can be. I have had to learn by trial and error too. I'm still learning all the time. All I can say is don't get frustrated, just take in all the advice your given and learn from it.

Yes, Tupka, didn't specify why it was deleted but I can see why and I'll give you a little constructive crisicism.

Besides the OOU, it didn't make for interesting or concise reading. You have several sentences that could all be streamlined into one. You are a little repetitive, look how many times you mention Azarath in a short amount of time. You also shifted into present tense in the last sentence when the rest of the article is correctly written in past tense.

When writing a history, keep it as brief and clear as possible. Never add anything unless you can add a citation after it, even if she only appears in two films, add the relevant sources using the ref tags with each paragraph of new information.