Thread:FishTank/@comment-3361105-20160427152559/@comment-3361105-20160428211832

I can, but I think you'll find after it's done that you won't like it. More lines and borders tend to break the cleaner aesthetic.

My concern is that a lack of some kind of delimiter between the story titles when they're collapsed makes them look like they're one element, and not two. I'd just as soon not have a background colour on those, if we could find a way to make it clearer that they're separate elements. I'm well aware, and I'm not too happy with it either. It was an easy CSS solution, but I'm a little hard pressed to find a better one that's not absurdly hacky, code bloated, or the like. You say that like you think we would have a problem with code bloat and hacks!

Additionally, taking an independent element like that is counterproductive from a usability perspective. Not to mention that the asymmetry detracts from the aesthetic.

Are you saying that having a big title-box that breaks from the standard format is symmetrical? I disagree. My request was in order to make it detract less from the desired aesthetic. See also: we want the whole infobox to look as much like the original infobox as possible.

The point of making it collapsible in the first place was to make it less prominent and space-consumptive. Now it's grabbing more attention than it deserves. Which - with regards to your suggestion to stick it under the other cover artists (a non-collapsible element that I don't want to be collapsible) - is why I'd rather not do that.