Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27892537-20161207170219/@comment-18172179-20161208173456

Working with something that already exists sounds much better to me than starting from scratch. Besides, it would only become redundant.

Before I address some of your concerns, N8, could you provide an example of teams with one volume or a couple of short ones that are not categorized?

Now, as a handful of editors we are, we have to prioritize the information. If there are teams that haven't got their own title category, maybe it is due to their small relevance or the definition of "team". That may not always be the case, but in most cases, it is true.

If there are missing titles from the team titles category, the best approach is to include the category on the title's page. Like what I just did with Batman Family V. 1

Before creating a category for teams that don't have one, the questions to be asked are: "Is it a team?" and "Is the title exclusive about the team?" As for filling the gaps, yes, that is the way to do it, as I mentioned above.

About that last part, I do agree that it would probably be beneficial to have that category in the category box, but it would disrupt the categorization format. I'm thinking better of a wikitext link to the Comics by Team catgory at the "See Also" section of the page, but without the ability to modify the template to make it automatically appear, we'd still need to go and include the link manually. That doesn't sound appealing to me, but that would be the best solution in this case.