Thread:Lordofninjas1/@comment-1038387-20180211193039/@comment-4276072-20180212014317

Thank you for letting me know some of the issues, you have better problem solving smarts than some others on here. As for my rebuttal to your notes 1. I genuinely thought I did have a capital at the beginning there (I am more used to the mobile version of the site where a lot of times things like that are just auto-capitalized and stuff, so that might be part of the problem), that is my bad and if you'll allow me to revert the update and stuff for things like that I'll go back and correct it.

2. I do normally capitalize the first word of titles and subtitles (I capitalize all words in titles because that's how most sites seem to do it and I have vague memories of being taught that in English class), however as I mentioned in my first reply to this words like the, a, an etc. are classified as articles and even though they may be used in a title or name they don't actually need to be capitalized, mostly because it's more "filler" text than anything else, for lack of a better term, if that makes any sense.

3. I'm well aware random nouns aren't capitalized in the body of sentences, I'll admit sometimes I do slip up and accidentally do that, but most of the time it's either because I'm just not paying attention, or I genuinely think it needs to be capitalized for whatever reason.

I do remember learning that titles are put in italics or quotes, however, I have seen more times than not on this site bolded and non-italicised titles and sometimes non-quoted titles, so I figured it was something to do with the formats you keep hounding me over, which is why I did it that way (that and not being exactly sure how to italicise things on the site).

I'm not saying you do get paid or that you should follow behind editors to fix mistakes, I'm not sure where you thought I did say that either. What I was meaning, and seem to have said, was that when you happen across it, rather than just deleting it, either correct it, let it be, or let me (or whoever the offending person is) what the problem is and at least I (and some others) would go and fix it without it needing to be deleted. Basically, I'm not saying you should follow around everything I do or anything, but if you come across a problem in one of my submissions like this (like if it's just grammatical stuff or spelling or capitalization mistakes as an example) rather than deleting it (as minor issues like that really don't actually warrant a deletion) either correct it yourself or if you don't have the time to or don't feel like it let me know and I'll fix it when I'm able to, or if you don't feel like doing either of those just leave it be as it isn't speculation (which actually does warrant a deletion) and it isn't harming the article in any way, and in fact is actually bettering the article, even if it isn't formatted in the way you like (but things like notes really don't need to be formatted, as they are technically out of universe and more of a "behind the scenes" thing, for lack of a better term, more of a "did you know" section than a biographical section or whatever (which does mostly require formatting). In other words it's more like someone studying for a test and just scribbling things in the margins of the page or a friend walking up to you and saying "did you know ...?" and none of that is formatted in any specific way, nor should it be, same thought process applies here. Also, I wasn't digging in my heels and not bothering to fix the mistakes, how am I supposed to know what to fix when all that is provided to me is stuff like "grammar errors" or "mistakes in capitalization"? I mean I appreciate you letting me know that there are issues with the grammar or whatever but how am I to fix those "grammar errors" or "mistakes in capitalization" without knowing where the issues lie ot what the issues are, if that makes any sense. In other words, I wasn't refusing to correct the mistakes, I was not fully informed of what the mistakes were that needed to be fixed so I couldn't properly fix them. Think of it this way, if the power goes out in your house and you are wanting to fix it but all you are given is "problems with the wiring" or something like that how are you supposed to properly address the issue and bring the power back to your house? You've only been told that there is problems with the wiring, you don't know whether one of the wires got disconnected and just needs reconnecting or if you need to rewire your entire home or just replace certain wires or what, so how can you fix the problem when you don't know what it is, same logic applies here.