Thread:FishTank/@comment-3361105-20160427152559/@comment-4522253-20160427165709

The processing time is long for both. I'd like to create something that's more lightweight under the hood to compensate. For example, it would detect when there are more than 5 stories and load the heavier duty template invisibly to the user. Let's identify our "pain points" as small (1-5 stories), medium (5-25 stories), and large (25-35 stories). Does that seem about right?

We may need an alternative for the variant cover situation, if we can't hide the buttons. Having 25 little boxes - small or large - in the middle of an infobox just strikes me as cluttered. As the default is above the Image, what I've done is already a bit of a CSS hack. How many covers are we looking at as "too many"? I'm assuming the default is below 10 (which has 5 rows of two). If the template detects more than that, we can switch to a different layout. Can you give me a link to a use case of more than 10 covers? Is it possible to just insert the old collapsible gallery code into the portable infobox? What we could do is insert it where there are more than a set number of covers. It won't be able to dynamically change the image like it can now, but they'd be available as pop-up windows.