Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-265341-20150613182449/@comment-25263388-20150718111749

I'll admit that this is my first edit on this wiki; however I have read article content often (Epic Rap Battles of History wiki being my big wiki, I use this to research for rap battles occasionally, and sometimes I read because it's awesome); I think SforHope is a very valid nomination. For another wiki I am a bureaucrat on, that is, Moleman's Epic Rap Battles Wiki, I have had to deal with bitter banned users, one specifically who commonly sockpuppets and vandalises the wiki. As a bureaucrat, I have also dealt with staff nominations. Three criteria, I find, are valid:
 * 1) Usefulness of edits
 * 2) Relationship with other users, esp. staff (only relevant in wikis that are in some way social)
 * 3) Activity

If an admin or crat thinks a user has these qualities, then it only makes sense to nominate them. The community has the final say in the end, so I don't see how it would be overly relevant to form an objection to the nomination, but rather to him taking the position by directly opposing it, giving the reasoning for such as well.