Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28125426-20161101045750/@comment-18172179-20161102212320

Regarding the category, I see no harm about it. If that's something the community wants and would like to overlook, then by all means. It doesn't seem something too difficult to index since it works within a broad concept and doesn't require specific citations. Unlike the "glass wearers" category (with subcategories as mentioned above). Too... intricate.

Now, as Kyle mentioned, the inclusion of the category doesn't give every average Joe the warrant to have their own page. I would merge both arguments made by Davy Dave and Etrigan: "All characters should have a page, only if the author is capable of filling the character's page with as much accurate information available."

While there are no official guidelines/parameters when creating character pages, I personally believe there is a "threshold" of attributes we should consider:
 * Full Name/Alias
 * Costumed Characters/Special Abilities
 * Recurrence of Appearances
 * Historical Significance
 * Information Available

In the past, some users created blank pages for characters they considered important, and when someone researched those characters, the info turned out to be inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Take for example Arthur Jameson (Earth-Two) or Tycoon of Crime (Earth-Two). Both pages were created by the same user, and both characters are single appearance characters. Do we really need every crook Superman or Batman confronted in the Golden/Silver Ages? Maybe, if the community wants to, but the imput needs to be complete. Not like this.