Thread:Adepk/@comment-1038387-20160328220454/@comment-1038387-20160328223834

It's our policy, we go on guidebooks over artbooks. And if it's complicated, usually (with heights and weights) we go for most recent. There's some more leeway in terms of eye color, which I now added all three to.

Everyone can contribute, within the policy of sourcing. If available, we source eye colors from reference works and guidebooks. Those are hard and absolute data we can't ignore just because they don't seem right to you. It's not up to us to declare some of them incorrect, but others correct. We note the discrepancy. We're a wiki, we chronicle stuff. Including stuff that has changed.

The point of a community of editors is that people can add stuff others forgot (such as your reference for blue eyes, I didn't have that one at hand). Not "tons of people on another website have images cut out with a, therefore b and c are wrong."

And because you defaced the page, you've been banned from editing for a while.