Thread:Tupka217/@comment-3567304-20130909222557/@comment-220364-20130911003730

@Kowalski, you may want to park the persecution complex, it isn't doing anyone any good.

And a few points regarding what you reverted to:
 * "Capitol" as a parameter is not functional. It adds nothing to the page. (BTW, this is also the case with "Official Language".)
 * "City", "State", and "Province" are of no use in the article on Brazil. They are designed for use for locating smaller locations. An article on a city would have a "State" or "Province" specified for grouping purposes. "City" would be used with a neighborhood, street, dwelling, or similar location.
 * The population is an estimate made in 2013. "2013 estimate" is the proper English term.
 * "(5th)" would need an explanation and a very, very good reason to be appended to the land area.
 * A history section is more or less unnecessary, as well as hard to maintain. At best it would be the broad strokes of the real world history. Some very notable in-story events might, might be worth inclusion.
 * Repeating the points of interest and residents sections in a limited list in the history is not necessary. Pure and simple.

Also, a fuller list of the appearances in the appearance category does a better job of showing how the country has been presented in various continuities.