Thread:Tupka217/@comment-3403804-20130816162637/@comment-3403804-20130816170049

There's a difference between conciseness and lack of information, I consider all of those articles to be highly concise and informative, they're detailed and they've got stellar grammar which makes them some of the best articles on the entire site. Which after all, is what an Encyclopedia should be, informative, while I agree that there's no reason to cite every single thing that a character does. It IS necessary to ensure that the reader gets a good understanding of the character by reading our articles, many of these are much too minimalistic, they're just barely more informative than stubs. To make an effort to discourage detail and proper information seems highly counterintuitive towards the intended goal of this Wiki, wouldn't you agree?

I'll be using the example of Superhuman Strength here, like we know, Alan has Superhuman Strength, but this is a very common power and can mean a thousand different things. To not describe such a section with detail isn't "conciseness" that's being intentionally vague. What is concise in this case is to describe it in the most efficient and simplest manner possible so that the reader actually gets an understanding of their level of strength. Superhuman Strength is known to vary immensely from character to character which is why it should be important to describe it individually. Highly specific powers such as Energy Construct Creation are obviously different, and I agree that explaining that in detail is unnecessary considering the page it links to.