Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1038387-20150101215847/@comment-3361105-20150120001353

I think I have also decisively said elsewhere that your arguments will not sway us to change our position anymore than ours yours, and as such, it is redundant to keep dragging the issue out.

How does it hurt us to have that information? It doesn't - if we use it in an appropriate way, like including a note about the publication history on the character page. That is useful. That is sufficient deference to the company and the character's pre-DC history.

As for the comic pages, the main reason not to have them is clutter. When you first joined the site, you should at least have had an inkling that you were contributing to a comprehensive history of DC Comics, not just comics. I think, more appropriately, year by year, it is becoming more apparent that your only contributions to this site have been public domain comic books that don't belong to DC and are only tangentially related because of characters they later bought from different companies. Since you're from the UK, you might find this analogy more appropriate than our go-to of the frontier of the Old West: When you joined the wiki, it was all Gauls and Celts. The Romans have come, Tony. The Romans have come, and they have brought civilization. And then the Christian missionaries came, and disposed of the old pagan gods, and now you shall honour only one god, and that god is DC Comics, Tony. You shall have no false idols.