Thread:Tupka217/@comment-689-20160509204114/@comment-689-20160509211533

I'd still appreciate a response from some other admins, because I've added such information to other 'tie-in' articles before without it being reverted -- so I'd like the discussion to expand to examine why some edits are disallowed currently, but were not disallowed previously. I believe that, as an admin group, it would help the tone of your wiki to look at what policy demanded you revert the article where other admins have let this pass.

I'd like you to point out which policy allowed your reversion, which I still feel was incorrect, because your explanation makes the entire article seem unnecessary, or at the very least reveals flaws in your templating structure that request the information.

Additionally, as a complete reversion, your actions against me also removed valid information such as the executive editor credit, which I believe you would want to keep according to the templating/category structure. I administrate on other Wikias and find that to be a violation of the undo/rollback rights granted to you, because in the case of incorrect edits, valid information should be kept while other information is deleted. I believe that wholesale reversion to be a violation of the basic wiki tenet of 'keeping edits made in good faith' and I'd like it explained. -- Captain MKB 21:15, May 9, 2016 (UTC)