Thread:LoveWaffle/@comment-1387629-20130321223747/@comment-1895174-20130322014428

If that's the rule, it's not in effect. Not only are you the only admin to take similar issue with the page, and any page of its sort, but other admins have edited that page and others without removing similar information. It also doesn't help that there are citation templates on the wiki that allow editors to link to outside sources. I also looked for any documentation or codified set of rules that says outside sources cannot be used, and can't find one.

I can't expect to be accommodated when there's nothing to accommodate - there is no rule in place that says outside sources cannot be used.

I don't think you have a vendetta against me, nor should I have any reason to believe so (should I?). I'm just trying to understand this mind-numbingly bizarre and seemingly arbitrary decision you're making regarding sources on this one particular page.