Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-436164-20180919233316/@comment-18172179-20180920003553

The problem with separate sub-sections by Ages is that it's just as arbitrary as the current format. Sure you can separate stories by Ages, but what about characters who were created in the Bronze/Modern Ages? They won't have any Golden or Silver Age sections, so I see nothing to gain there.

I see a point for origins/reboots, but only for characters that have had more than 5 relevant reboots like Superman. No point including that for characters like Ra's al Ghul or Bane, who have never had more than one origin story.

The DCAU and other books have some good stories, so I see a valid point there.

As you see, the main point of having the current format is to have standard settings for this pages, at least when it comes to organizing them. Personally, I don't see how they are confusing in that way. The point of those pages is highlight the top stories of these characters, which is why there is no actual need to go for too much detail and list all the books where the characters appear. Just the ones that are actually relevant in their publication history. They can be properly curated? For sure. I, for once, believe the Batman one is overkill.