Category talk:Move/Archives

Centralized Move discussions
Proposal: To have all move discussions take place here, rather than the individual article talk page. Reason: To make it easier for editors to participate in Move discussions by making them easier to Watchlist and find. Implementation: Change the destination in the Move template from Discuss to Discuss. Create a template for use on article talk pages, indicating that a move discussion has taken place and directing editors here.

Discussion
I'm not sure about this change; I think making it easier to find move discussions is a good thing, but it's such a fundamental change that I don't want to do it without input from others. The Paradox 00:28, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sounds perfectly fine to me.
 * - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 00:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sounds, good to me as well. A static talk page would certainly be more ideal. Course we also have the option of the forums as well. Those are a little easier to keep track of changes. But I'm perfectly cool with a meta-move talk page. --Brian Kurtz 03:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Aye, I say, by the corner of my eye.
 * I hope it works as good as it sounds. :)
 * Can we get the pages that are still in discussion in a sub-category than the pages that are ready to be moved? I'm not sure this has been addressed yet or not, but it makes sense to have things in different stages of moving in different sections.
 * &mdash; Nathan (Peteparker) (Earth-1218) (talk &bull; contribs &bull; email) 03:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Centralizing it would make discussions easier.
 * Roygbiv666 00:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Active discussions have been moved here, all that I could find anyway. All "Reality Unknown" and "Full Name Unknown" articles have been moved to subcategories. The only articles left in the category are those whose discussions are still in process, the only discussions on this page are still active (if kinda stale in some cases). Is that close enough to the staging area you desired, Nathan? The Paradox 16:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)