Board Thread:Policies/@comment-32540247-20200216120319/@comment-3361105-20200218004848

Koavf wrote: it's actually very useful for someone who wants to read good comics. Just presenting information without any curation is not quite as helpful.

Is it our job as an encyclopedia to tell people what’s good, or direct how they approach comics? I’m absolutely on board with us having curated recommended reading lists like we do already have (and which need more frequent updates), but i don’t know that i like informational issue lists being broken up by author and a smattering of first/last appearances. Seems like we’d be just as well served, if not better, by a recommended reading page that notes the run, the author, and notable happenings during that run.

This feels more like adding editorial asides to a table of contents than curation.