Thread:Tupka217/@comment-3008558-20140719111226/@comment-220364-20140720180216

Frankly, with that first line of yours the only solution is for you to stop contributing to wikis other than the ones where you set the rules. In almost all other cases you will run into the exact same problem of your work being changed to fit rules, standards, and limits set by others.

Aside from that, there are two issues with your statements:
 * Vandalism on a wiki is not editing articles to bring them in line with content standards on a site. No mater how those standards are arrived at. It never has been and never will be. The term is applied to will damage or subversion of an article. Things like removal of content that fit with in site standards and scope, spam, altering of content to disparage or ridicule, and false information, and the like. What is being applied here is not vandalism except in your eyes based on your investiture in your work.
 * Using this or, in border terms, this as a label to lash out at those you disagree with is a very repugnant and petty act. Just because you aren't getting your way does not mean those labels should be applied. That rules and limits are being applied also do not justify that. In all group endeavors there are going to be rules, and more oft than not the rules will be applied, hopefully fairly and not capriciously. In the case of this wiki the attempt is to apply the rules, the limit on scope, evenly. The rub is you dislike it because it fit your personal idea of what the scope should be. It isn't being used to bully you or scapegoat you, it's just not what you want. That can justify noisily leaving, and, if this site was operating under a CC-BY-SA based on British copyright law, taking your toys - the original content you provided - with you. But it in no way justifies the insult you decided to sling in anger.