Thread:Tupka217/@comment-6595-20140717184816/@comment-6595-20140717193635

That's a shame. I've spent a lot of work over the years polishing up his article, and I think almost every single one of his appearances is described except for the one you just removed. His entire page is made of similar sections. It would take some significant work to pare things down to how you describe.

In any case, I'm not that impressed with how things are being run these days. I'm a former admin who popped out of the woodwork today to make a contribution, and I think I'll pop back into the woodwork.