Thread:Tupka217/@comment-6369172-20150919214210/@comment-6369172-20150921100023

Lucien61 wrote: This is one rare case of a retroactive merger actually making sense.

If it's one rare case, then it's not the case on which a general rule should be based. And if it breaks an existing rule, or is inconsistent with existing practice, then it's a "rule of convenience" and not a good thing.