Board Thread:Policies/@comment-1038387-20180506105530/@comment-18172179-20180506221821


 * The change in naming standard was something like what Marvel does, and plenty of other wiki too. I don't like it any more than you, but [Character] 0001.jpg is a ferociously bad pagename. Also, I don't feel like changing thousands of images.
 * Captions are not redundant. They add text to the image, explaining what's in them/where they're from. It's way better for SEO.
 * Our system is not incompatible with tabbers (see the comic template), but it's worse than a gallery.
 * I guess my sarcasm was not obvious enough. Adopting the "Marvel Method" is an idea I particularly like and have been doing to some degree without consequences, but am aware others won't like it. That said, nobody's going to rename all our files so we're secrewed there anyway. Just change the policy going forwards and let the past remain rotten.
 * If "captions" are what I believe they are, we run in the same issue as naming files. The same amount of work for less reward, thus the redundancy.
 * What I meant by compatibility is visual and practical use. Having character pages with one meekly tab that switches to that character's gallery would make them look rather different from the rest of pages on the site, losing that "compatibility". Should've said "uniformity".

I've already given suggestions that I believe are most practical and require the least amount of work.