Thread:Tupka217/@comment-5924705-20130106235247/@comment-5924705-20130107220155

That is absolutely ridiculous. I guess I should proceed to edit "He is a human" on to catwomans page and "contrary to popular belief BATman is not in fact a bat" on batman page. We should strive to improve this wiki, not clutter it down with ridiculous and redundant "information" just because thats "the way its done"

If you disagree that it is redundant to put "He is a dog" under a picture of a dog on a page titled "Titus the Dog" filled with information detailing his life as a dog than frankly I can't respect your opinion. Why can't we just just use the "race" section to simply jot down "dog" or "geat dane" and be done with it? We don't need a whole properly grammered sentence in the middle of it all. Look at how out of place this is: Gender: Male Eyes: Black Hair: Brown Unusual Features: He's a dog. It's all pointed information and them wham a random sentence. It doesn't say "He is male" "Titus has beautiful black eyes" "His fur is a lusciously soft dark brown blend". It says Male Black Brown He's a dog. And while I'm on the subject of dragging the entire Wiki down with ridiculous redundant information: why does the (might I add UNKNOWN) marital status have to be specified as "single"? These are dogs we are talking about; many of which we have no idea whether or not they might have relations, many we have definitely seen to have a minimum of at least passing interests, and in the case of mammoth mutt and miss from earth one: there isn't even a mention of marital status. the two dogs that it actually does apply to don't have a mention in their stats side bar. I don't know about the 'Krypto the superdog' universe dogs as to my understanding thats more of a sentient dog cartoon where they all have essentially the personalities of humans in dogs bodies, so I left the "single" designation on all of their pages. But for ever other animal on this database its just ridiculous. And on Aquadogs page, assuming it was you who reverted that edit as well, why is it necessary to have a quote saying "arrff!" -Aqua-dog on the top of the page right beside the picture that the quote is from? Wouldn't it be much more appropriate to have a quote from Deputy Wilson naming the dog? Or Mera talking about how she needs to buy food for her dog? "Aarff!" is not a quote with or without the picture right beside it. We need to think with our heads here folks - not with history of protocol or fear of change. we need to do what is logical and informative. Out with the ridiculous and redundant, in with the information!