Thread:Tupka217/@comment-10786238-20140427002515/@comment-220364-20140427233442

Would we be moving all of the physical descriptor categories to match gender and wings? And that would not just be Fangs and Claws but everything here and the sub categories. At the moment Winged Characters is the only physical descriptor under Characters by Physical Features that includes "Characters" as part of the category name.

Also, if the conceit is that the Winged Characters more clearly reflect what the category should contain, what would be done with race and species articles that include the templates "Wings", "Claws", and "Fangs"? Since the pages do not deal with individual characters, they should not be in a category with "Characters" in the title. If that is the route this is headed, then rave/species categories mirroring renamed character categories for pointed ears, wings, tails, ect. would be need and something would need to be done with the Power templates which are used on the race/species pages to differentiate which category goes into.

Right now that isn't an issue, since the category titles don't use "Character", the parent categories do, and the description on the category pages are generally written to cover both characters and groups, not as only covering one or the other.

This is where I'm coming from Rab:
 * Wings fits as a category title as the category structure is currently structured and implemented.
 * Simplifying that one category pair to mach the current structure is less disruptive that reworking dozens of other categories.
 * The coding in the templates is, or should be, a near non-issue.

Is there a salient point I'm missing?