Thread:Shadzane/@comment-6369172-20140530115832

"Do we really need to put the featured character's name in front of the title? I think it makes the page look cluttered. Shadzane (talk) 21:25, May 29, 2014 (UTC)"

The page does get a bit more cluttered, maybe, but at the same time much more informative. Captain Marvel Junior fans might or might not care about Buck Jones, El Carim, or the Companions Three. I sure don't, but somebody might. So to make life easier all around, and save time for the reader, I think it's good to add those identifiers that point the reader to the stories he seeks, or seeks to avoid. The alternative, and what I've been finding on most of these pages, has been a list of seven or eight generic, uninformative titles, leaving the reader to figure out who appears in what, based on the writer/artist credits or by trial-and-error. The features don't appear in the same sequence from one issue to the next (I'm churning thru More Fun Comics right now; it's a mess), so I think it's good, there, to mark where the Doctor Fate story or the Spectre story is, just like here it's good to mark where the Bulletman story or the Minute Man story happens. The point of a wiki is to be informative, no? 