Thread:Tupka217/@comment-689-20160509204114

Hi, there seems to be some confusion about how this wiki approaches Star Trek comics, so I wanted to touch base with you about the edits i made, as you seem to have bypassed any communication with me, which is a sure path to an edit war.

I responded initially to markings on the Star Trek comics' pages regarding their need for an executive editor credit (it was categorized in a way that indicated that info was missing), which i looked up in the lettercolumn indicia and correctly added. I also noticed that there was a maintenance template indicating that the article needed a list of characters.

Now your eventual note explaining your reversion of all my edits and additions was that this wiki does not catalog this info, which is a bit frustrating because i surfed here and responded to those maintenance categories and templates indicating the information was needed. I spent some time doing so as completely as I could.

Also, your edit summary indicated that the templating had been de-constructed is untrue. I left all template fields that were present in the initial edit, albeit with the removal of double spaces and double linebreaks.

Now, as a new user, I find the atmosphere here a little combative with your double edit war reversion of my good faith additions of information that was requested of me by your own templates, so I wonder if you could direct me to a bureaucrat or arbitrator of policy who could communicate any other 'introductory information' to me in a friendly manner, as i'd like to contribute to the wiki, and have my additions be copyedited and kept when valid and true, rather than removed wholesale in a discourteous manner without any communication about what is 'wrong' or 'right' about what I am doing. It's a matter of treating a newer contributor to the wiki in a professional manner. Thank you for your time. -- Captain MKB 20:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC) 