Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1038387-20150101215847/@comment-3361105-20150102142303

On the one hand, I think what we've been saying for years: No pages for stuff not owned by DC. On the other hand, anything that is referenced in any way by a DC publication should at least be mentioned somewhere.

It's a balance between covering tangentially relevant material, and not succumbing to focus-creep.

Perhaps it would be best to maintain our pages for Fox and A-C etc. (the companies only), if only to have a place to explain the historical circumstances which led to DC owning the properties they once did.