132,737
pages
ALL POSTS
<p>It's not a bad decision but I look forward to his performance on the Batman. His movies may be bad but this might be a fresh start for him. Although it's his first time playing the caped crusader. He should have no problem because he played roles in dark movies. </p>
<p>I think it's a good chlice. He is a good actor and he has shown that he has the skills to pull this off. So I am hopeful. If someone thinks he is a bad actor because of his role in Twilight, then watch Bel Ami, Good Time, High Life, Cosmopolis, Remember Me and Water For Elephants for now.</p>
I'm willing Pattinson a chance. He was in Harry Potter before Twilight plus he's also come out and said he hates Twilight, so maybe he's a cool guy now. Maybe he'll be the best Batman since Michael Keaton who was also criticized when he was first cast.
(Edited by DarthSpiderMaul)
I think everyone here, including me will eat their words in the next ten years in some way.
<p>i was hesitant at first, thinking he’d be bad because of his acting in twilight. But that was only because of his character, I’m worried more about ‘Batman’ though. As he’s my favourite hero and it would kill me if it was bad, but his other stuff is good. So I’m going to trust him. </p><p>
</p>
</p>
Give him a chance. Remember people were up in arms about Keaton as Batman once. He prooved them wrong so can he.
I got only one thing to say.
Ew.
<p>I'm interested. Better hold on tight, Spider monkey. XD</p><p>
</p>
</p>
I do see the possibility
This post should probably be locked.