Obviously, the true indicators of a movie's success are the box office results and the reception from fans and critics, not the amount of likes on social media websites like Facebook. Even so, this is still an unironic W for Superman because it proves that there is a very public interest in this movie.
Of course, because the Internet is gonna Internet, there is always gonna be a jackass wanting to rain over people's parade. On this case, we have David Ayer getting backlash because he supports the new DCU.
Heaven forbid filmmakers standing in solidarity with other filmmakers, am I right?
I am excited about the movie not gonna let anything ruin my parade
Looks good 👍
Lex Luthor main Villain as usual 😎
WDW Pro has made a video in which he and his friends talk about the possibility of Gunn trying to make a political statement in this movie.
WDW Pro and his friends have always spoken out against people inserting their personal politics in Hollywood movies, so make of this video what you will.
Yeah I can see that
Is that "people inserting their personal politics in Hollywood movies", or "people inerting politics opposite of my own in Hollywood movies"?
The first one, I can see that happening
When people say that they don't want politics in Hollywood movies, what they actually mean is that they don't want Hollywood movies to feature a specific kind of politics.
To a certain extent, every single piece of art out there is political, lest we forget that Superman debuted as a champion of social justice. He was literally called the "Champion of the Oppressed".
I would say superman is a character if a different era
Superman is Rises again