Haven't read it personaly but most dig Azzarello's run on Wonder Woman which introduced that retcon

What does WW's origin have to do with the quality of a story? An origin doesn't define who WW is as a person?

@Leader Vladimir Yeah, but many dislike that version of her origin and claim it has no good stories so I want to know more objective opinions about that

Opinions, by their very nature, are subjective and there is no objectively correct way to measure a story's worth. If you like something, it's fine. If you don't like it, that's fine, too.

I don't think we will ever get that

The objectivity of what is good art and weather objectively good art exists or not is a major debate in philosophy.

I don't think quality of art is or can be objective, but I enjoyed that initial Azzarello run. I also understand why Wonder Woman fans would react to some parts of it with anger! What Azzarello did to the Amazons is comparable to making Jor-El tell Kal to rule Earth without mercy! But I always liked Azzarello's take on Diana, her friends, and on the Olympians a lot, and Zeus being her birth-father is a big part of the story.

For whatever it's worth, Azzarello did make that part of WW's origin important to the story he was telling. He didn't change the origin just because he felt like it.