A, but I do believe he, Natasha and Lana should’ve gotten more of a spotlight in recent times. I absolutely would’ve preferred more Steel and Lana Lang Superwoman content over Lois Superwoman and Jon being aged up.

@ScavengerOne what this is implementing is how much you like them.

I fat-fingered an F. Really I’d give him a C+. He was only ever good when Christopher Priest wrote him.

I give him a B

Of these pictures, I'd give the S and D tier images an S rank, the F tier image an A rank, the C tier image a B rank, the B tier image a C rank, and the A tier image a D rank.

And I gave Steel himself an S rank! :D

@Cliff1647 why don’t you just use a 1-10 scale instead? Just saying!

Because they have multiple definitions concerning around them. Like, what would be a grade for a 3? A D-? Or an F+? It’s hard to determine.

I suggest a scale of 0 to 5. The letter-grade scale was designed to group characters based on their power and skill in combat. I agree with Scavenger that around these parts, it implies a character’s strength as an IP - popularity, market penetration, versatility in storytelling and media. It’s confusing to try to use it to mean how much you like one. If I say that, e.g., The Question is S-tier, I’m clearly not using the scale as intended. Sherlock Holmes makes a bit more sense in that way. A zero to five scale at least has the same number of steps, if that’s important to you.

That and it could still fit in the polls unlike 1-10.

I have to say he is probably about a B. His motivation is solid, and his technology acumen is a good bonus. I don't think he levels to most metahuman opposition.