No, it's the responsibility of the admin to tell the user what they've done wrong when the admin goes off the deep end automatically, which I've seen for many years.
This wiki has a fair group of admins, then downplays itself as not being able to take responsibility.
The admin could also look at the user, and if her or she has been around long enough to take action. So, whether it's a new user with 5 edits, or an old user with 1000 edits across several years.
No, no matter who the user is, they suddenly discover their edit/image/page/whatever has been deleted without a single word why. So, the lowly user has to ask the all knowing admin why their contribution has been deleted.
An admin has a life (I'm not sure what that has got to do with anything, WE ALL HAVE REAL LIVES, I'm not going to bug you about the fact that I am a co-carer looking after my younger brother who is going thru anti-psychotic withdrawals after almost 13 years of being misdiagnosed), but when an admin is on the job, that's neither here or there.
And you all keep acting like I'm some random person who is new. No, if I was new, I'd probably get it. But I have a problem because I am not new, and that's why I'm appalled at the treatment that an admin is still acting this way. Not that I'm expecting the admins to remember every single person who has come along, but a little courtesy goes along way. (I still don't get what all these problems I've supposed to have caused, it looked completely fine to me. I do not know what Tupka is seeing that I'm not. I uploaded the image with the template and filled it out the best I could. I gave a source and a description. What's wrong there?)
It's just all rather fussy of the admin(s) when it's incredibly ridiculous treatment. I could've little bit by now, but instead because of the ridiculous treatment, I haven't. And Justice League Action has a little less attention than it could've. And that's why I just wanted to contribute on that particular occasion to help out with Justice League Action.