Betty and Veronica?
While I'm sure that the final page in this issue is likely a wink to Betty and Veronica, is there anything that says for certain that this is them? --Brian Kurtz 21:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well the time frame for it makes sense. And honestly if they weren't recognised as a wink to Archie comics they wouldn't be in this issue summary as 1952 girl at the drive-tru #1 and #2 they don't ad much to the plot, but give us a little smile. So yes, logical these two girls are not them but resemble the two girls (but how else to call them?) anything more and DC would have a lawsuit with Archie Comics I assume. I was thinking of calling there pages Cameo:Betty Cooper and Cameo:Veronica Lodge (same goes for the Fantastic Four, but I think i wrote that well enough) Or else Cameo: Archie and Friends.
- Ps. As a none American I don't feel I have a last say in this matter, I only know the comic by reputation. --Ouroborosi 06:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- If nothing is directly said, then maybe we don't need pages for them? Maybe the trivia section could have a notation that says The waitresses at the end of the issue are a clear nod to Betty Cooper and Veronica Lodge of Archie Comics fame. The team going into space is a reference to Marvel Comics' Fantastic Four. That's really all we need, I think. If they later become better established, then by all means we'll need pages for them, but until then... not every single appearance character has to have their own page.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.