that history section[]
I feel like a long-ass list of everyone who wrote on the title and the storylines that they wrote is a bit unnecessarily exhaustive. It's certainly exhausting to read. I propose paring it down/deleting all that "blank wrote blank after blank" stuff. Reads like the "josephus begat matthias who begat colin the shetland pony, who begat sparkles" in the bible. - Hatebunny (talk) 22:56, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. We should just list the main creators (a.k.a the people who wrote the most issues/storylines etc.) Also, are we gonna do the same thing for pages just like this? Neptune - Everything's impossible until somebody does it. 23:03, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe only a summary of the core storylines and a mention to Balent for his long run. I'd offer myself to do it, but I'm not much into Catwoman. -S.S. (talk) 00:34, October 16, 2014 (UTC)
- I wrote that section and I disagree. I think it's interesting, and it doesn't take away from the article. I like that you can see the book's entire history at a glance. I would like to do sections like this for other long-running titles. It might be exhausting to read... but you can always choose not to read it, and I would rather have information than not information. - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 17:42, October 16, 2014 (UTC)